The Danish Flexicurity Model - a Lesson for the US?
Research paper by Anna Ilsøe (June 2007)
In recent years, increasing international competition has caused an increase in job transitions worldwide. Many countries find it difficult to manage these transitions in a way that ensures a match between labour and demand. One of the countries that seems to manage the transitions in a successful way is Denmark, where unemployment has been dropping dramatically over the last decade without a drop in job quality. This success is ascribed the so-called Danish flexicurity model, where an easy access to hiring and firing employees (flexibility) is combined with extensive active and passive labour market policies (security).
The Danish results have gained interest not only among other European countries, where unemployment rates remain high, but also in the US, where job loss is often related to lower job quality. It has, however, been the subject of much debate both in Europe and in the US, whether or not countries with distinctively different political-economic settings can learn from one another. Some have argued that cultural differences impose barriers to successful policy transfer, whereas others see it as a perfectly rational calculus to introduce 'best practices' from elsewhere.
This paper presents a third strategy. Recent literature on policy transfer suggests that successful cross-national policy transfer is possible, even across the Atlantic, but that one must be cautious in choosing the form, content and level of the learning process. By analysing and comparing the labour market policies and their settings in Denmark and the US in detail, this paper addresses the question - what and how can the US learn from the Danish model?
Where the US and Denmark share a high degree of flexibility, they differ significantly on the level of security. This also means that the Danish budget for active and passive labour market policies is significantly higher than the American one, and it seems unlikely that political support for the introduction of Danish levels of security in the US can be established. However, the paper concludes that there is learning potential between the US and Denmark in the different local level effectiveness of the money already spent. A major reason for the Danish success has been the introduction of tailor-made initiatives to the single displaced worker and a stronger coordination between local level actors. Both of which are issues where a lack of efficiency in the implementation of American active labour market policies has been reported.