Ideas and power in employment relations studies
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Ideas and power in employment relations studies. / Carstensen, Martin B.; Ibsen, Christian Lyhne; Schmidt, Vivien A.
In: Industrial Relations, Vol. 61, No. 1, 2022, p. 3-21.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Ideas and power in employment relations studies
AU - Carstensen, Martin B.
AU - Ibsen, Christian Lyhne
AU - Schmidt, Vivien A.
N1 - https://doi.org/10.1111/irel.12302
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Motivated by the efforts to understand shifting dynamics of change and stability in employment relations—not least ones brought on by a decade of crisis in what was a neoliberal consensus—scholars increasingly focus on the role of ideas, discourses, and identities. This paper argues for the potential of continuing down this path of employing ideational explanations in employment relations. First, it highlights four key weaknesses of employing more pure materialist–institutionalist approaches that have traditionally dominated employment relations scholarship. Second, it argues that to recognize and build on existing efforts to bring in ideas to employment relations, it is useful to place these on the macro-, meso-, and micro levels. Third, to further advance an ideational perspective on employment relations, it proposes to place more centrally the concept of ideational power. Fourth, it presents key insights from the papers that make up the Special Issue and fleshes out how the individual papers of the Special Issue contribute to this agenda.
AB - Motivated by the efforts to understand shifting dynamics of change and stability in employment relations—not least ones brought on by a decade of crisis in what was a neoliberal consensus—scholars increasingly focus on the role of ideas, discourses, and identities. This paper argues for the potential of continuing down this path of employing ideational explanations in employment relations. First, it highlights four key weaknesses of employing more pure materialist–institutionalist approaches that have traditionally dominated employment relations scholarship. Second, it argues that to recognize and build on existing efforts to bring in ideas to employment relations, it is useful to place these on the macro-, meso-, and micro levels. Third, to further advance an ideational perspective on employment relations, it proposes to place more centrally the concept of ideational power. Fourth, it presents key insights from the papers that make up the Special Issue and fleshes out how the individual papers of the Special Issue contribute to this agenda.
U2 - 10.1111/irel.12302
DO - 10.1111/irel.12302
M3 - Journal article
VL - 61
SP - 3
EP - 21
JO - Industrial Relations
JF - Industrial Relations
SN - 0019-8676
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 291987577