Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building : When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits! / Hansen, Nana Wesley; Krachler, Nick.

I: Economic and Industrial Democracy, 26.05.2023, s. 1-26.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Hansen, NW & Krachler, N 2023, 'Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!', Economic and Industrial Democracy, s. 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X231173462

APA

Hansen, N. W., & Krachler, N. (2023). Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits! Economic and Industrial Democracy, 1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X231173462

Vancouver

Hansen NW, Krachler N. Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits! Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2023 maj 26;1-26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X231173462

Author

Hansen, Nana Wesley ; Krachler, Nick. / Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building : When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!. I: Economic and Industrial Democracy. 2023 ; s. 1-26.

Bibtex

@article{a0ed1d0964744611871fa0c61ecc43bc,
title = "Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building: When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!",
abstract = "Competition between unions whose membership has different skills and professionalization levels is a long-standing issue in the labour movement. This article investigates the conditions for why and how a unique cross-professional coalition of all Danish public-sector unions developed between 2017 and 2018. Operating in a favourable context, unions overcame professionalization differences when skilled brokers primed a common instrumental base as other unionists used a public interest frame to legitimate the coalition and its demands ideologically. However, once the common instrumental concern was met, the coalition collapsed. The article argues that union coalition-building depends on multiple factors comprising both contextual, and identity and relational conditions. The article further argues that adopting a framing that focuses on the public interest over professional self-interest helps to successfully overcome professional cleavages.",
keywords = "Coalition, mobilizing, professionals, public sector employment relations, union strategy",
author = "Hansen, {Nana Wesley} and Nick Krachler",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2023.",
year = "2023",
month = may,
day = "26",
doi = "10.1177/0143831X231173462",
language = "English",
pages = "1--26",
journal = "Economic and Industrial Democracy",
issn = "0143-831X",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conditions for cross-professional union coalition-building

T2 - When enough is enough, but solidarity also has its limits!

AU - Hansen, Nana Wesley

AU - Krachler, Nick

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2023.

PY - 2023/5/26

Y1 - 2023/5/26

N2 - Competition between unions whose membership has different skills and professionalization levels is a long-standing issue in the labour movement. This article investigates the conditions for why and how a unique cross-professional coalition of all Danish public-sector unions developed between 2017 and 2018. Operating in a favourable context, unions overcame professionalization differences when skilled brokers primed a common instrumental base as other unionists used a public interest frame to legitimate the coalition and its demands ideologically. However, once the common instrumental concern was met, the coalition collapsed. The article argues that union coalition-building depends on multiple factors comprising both contextual, and identity and relational conditions. The article further argues that adopting a framing that focuses on the public interest over professional self-interest helps to successfully overcome professional cleavages.

AB - Competition between unions whose membership has different skills and professionalization levels is a long-standing issue in the labour movement. This article investigates the conditions for why and how a unique cross-professional coalition of all Danish public-sector unions developed between 2017 and 2018. Operating in a favourable context, unions overcame professionalization differences when skilled brokers primed a common instrumental base as other unionists used a public interest frame to legitimate the coalition and its demands ideologically. However, once the common instrumental concern was met, the coalition collapsed. The article argues that union coalition-building depends on multiple factors comprising both contextual, and identity and relational conditions. The article further argues that adopting a framing that focuses on the public interest over professional self-interest helps to successfully overcome professional cleavages.

KW - Coalition

KW - mobilizing

KW - professionals

KW - public sector employment relations

KW - union strategy

U2 - 10.1177/0143831X231173462

DO - 10.1177/0143831X231173462

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85163048667

SP - 1

EP - 26

JO - Economic and Industrial Democracy

JF - Economic and Industrial Democracy

SN - 0143-831X

ER -

ID: 373881033